Any correspondence between the necessary truth that exists by itself and the possible, even if it is obligatory for those who say so due to the necessity of the essence or the necessity of knowledge and its intellectual basis, is validly established from existential proofs, and between the evidence and the signified and the proof and the demonstrated must have some aspect through which the connection is relative to the evidence. And in relation to the signified by that evidence, and if it were not for that aspect, the signifier would never have reached the meaning of his evidence, so it is not correct for creation and truth to ever meet in a face in terms of the essence, but since this essence is attributed to divinity, this is another ruling that the minds are independent in perceiving, and everything that the mind is independent in perceiving with us is possible. That knowledge of it takes precedence over its witnesses, and the essence of the Almighty Truth is clear of this ruli